首页> 外文OA文献 >Tumor mismatch repair immunohistochemistry and DNA MLH1 methylation testing of patients with endometrial cancer diagnosed at age younger than 60 years optimizes triage for population-level germline mismatch repair gene mutation testing
【2h】

Tumor mismatch repair immunohistochemistry and DNA MLH1 methylation testing of patients with endometrial cancer diagnosed at age younger than 60 years optimizes triage for population-level germline mismatch repair gene mutation testing

机译:年龄小于60岁的子宫内膜癌患者的肿瘤错配修复免疫组织化学和DNA MLH1甲基化测试可优化人群水平种系错配修复基因突变测试的分类

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose: Clinicopathologic data from a population-based endometrial cancer cohort, unselected for age or family history, were analyzed to determine the optimal scheme for identification of patients with germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations. Patients and Methods: Endometrial cancers from 702 patients recruited into the Australian National Endometrial Cancer Study (ANECS) were tested for MMR protein expression using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and for MLH1 gene promoter methylation in MLH1-deficient cases. MMR mutation testing was performed on germline DNA of patients with MMR-protein deficient tumors. Prediction of germline mutation status was compared for combinations of tumor characteristics, age at diagnosis, and various clinical criteria (Amsterdam, Bethesda, Society of Gynecologic Oncology, ANECS). Results: Tumor MMR-protein deficiency was detected in 170 (24%) of 702 cases. Germline testing of 158 MMR-deficient cases identified 22 truncating mutations (3% of all cases) and four unclassified variants. Tumor MLH1 methylation was detected in 99 (89%) of 111 cases demonstrating MLH1/PMS2 IHC loss; all were germline MLH1 mutation negative. A combination of MMR IHC plus MLH1 methylation testing in women younger than 60 years of age at diagnosis provided the highest positive predictive value for the identification of mutation carriers at 46% versus ≤ 41% for any other criteria considered. Conclusion: Population-level identification of patients with MMR mutation-positive endometrial cancer is optimized by stepwise testing for tumor MMR IHC loss in patients younger than 60 years, tumor MLH1 methylation in individuals with MLH1 IHC loss, and germline mutations in patients exhibiting loss of MSH6, MSH2, or PMS2 or loss of MLH1/PMS2 with absence of MLH1 methylation. © 2013 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
机译:目的:分析未按年龄或家族史选择的基于人群的子宫内膜癌队列的临床病理数据,以确定鉴定具有生殖系错配修复(MMR)基因突变的患者的最佳方案。患者和方法:使用免疫组织化学(IHC)检测了702名入选澳大利亚国家子宫内膜癌研究(ANECS)的子宫内膜癌的MMR蛋白表达,并对MLH1缺陷病例的MLH1基因启动子甲基化进行了测试。对患有MMR蛋白缺陷的肿瘤患者的种系DNA进行MMR突变测试。比较了种系突变状态的预测,以综合考虑肿瘤特征,诊断年龄和各种临床标准(阿姆斯特丹,贝塞斯达,妇科肿瘤学会,ANECS)的组合。结果:702例病例中有170例(24%)检测到肿瘤MMR蛋白缺乏症。对158个MMR缺陷病例的生殖细胞测试鉴定了22个截短突变(占所有病例的3%)和4个未分类的变体。在111例MLH1 / PMS2 IHC丢失病例中,有99例(89%)检测到了肿瘤MLH1甲基化;所有均为种系MLH1突变阴性。在诊断时对年龄小于60岁的女性进行MMR IHC加MLH1甲基化检测相结合,为突变携带者的鉴定提供了最高的阳性预测值,对于其他考虑的标准,该值为46%,而≤41%。结论:通过逐步测试60岁以下患者的肿瘤MMR IHC丢失,MLH1 IHC丢失的患者的肿瘤MLH1甲基化以及表现出MHC丢失的患者的种系突变,可优化MMR突变阳性子宫内膜癌患者的人群水平识别。 MSH6,MSH2或PMS2或缺少MLH1甲基化的MLH1 / PMS2丢失。 ©2013美国临床肿瘤学会版权所有。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号